Web 2.0 is like the High School Lunch Room

The same social dynamic that happens in high school lunch rooms across the US is paralleled in social media.

Maybe you were one of the cool kids. I wasn’t. I was one of the faceless masses. The inane social order of the High School lunch room lives on through the internet. There was the cool kids table. You know what I’m talking about. For whatever reason, there was less than 5% of your school’s population that were revered as demi-gods. Usually, the reasons were not entirely understood - maybe they were football stars. Maybe they came from wealthy families. Maybe they just were good looking and knew it.

You then huddled with some other social group - maybe jocks…maybe the smart kids…maybe the stoners.

Here’s the kicker…most of the people that were in the “cool” crowd were a-holes. Not all of them, but most of them. They could do nothing wrong. Hell, their crap smelled like roses as far as they were concerned. These people were almost never all that smart either (with a few exceptions). In fact, most were C students at best (probably due to the prolific genocide of brain cells that would ensue on the weekends).

Most of the truly interesting people I knew where decidedly NOT in the “in” crowd. Yet, most people didn’t get to know them. They were lost as people clamored for the attention of the lunch room equivalent of Web 2.0 A-Listers. Looking back, I’m thankful that I woke up and stopped giving a rat’s arse what the cool kids did or thought.

The problem is that blogs are a model for the the high school lunch room. There are a-listers that have this entrenched position with everybody trying to break into that crowd. Everybody wants the spotlight on them. Because the a-lister content consistently gets seen, dug, stumbled, reposted, commented simply because it came from an a-lister, everybody else is drowned out as noise. That’s not to say that everything everybody is saying on their blogs deserves your attention, but I can guarantee that there’s high quality, relevant writing happening right now that you’ll never read or hear about.

I’m on a mission. I’m going to start trying to find these voices that I haven’t heard - the long tail of good bloggers. I want to find good bloggers that few people have heard of that deserve to be. I’m going to stop trying to impress or grab the attention of a-listers. I’m going to stop trying to emulate them too. Why? Because looking back, I had better friends in high school than the cool kids did and I had more of them. Who then was truly cool?

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!


4 Responses to “Web 2.0 is like the High School Lunch Room”

  • Pericone Says:

    I couldn’t agree more!

  • Neil Says:

    Hey Rob… I actually found you while searching for “is an MBA from Wake Forest worth the investment”… haha.

    Anyway I am in the triad and was interested in learning more about your thoughts and experience with the program. I am thinking of attending. The difference is that I’ll be paying not my company.

    So the question is I guess… If you paid for your MBA out of your pocket would you do it again?

    Feel free to email me.

    Thanks!

  • Rob Says:

    @Neil - yes I would. The fact that my company picked up the tab just made it so that I could do it sooner rather than saving.

    It’s difficult to know how much is just the natural course of my career and how much having the MBA affected things, but I’m making nearly 40% more per year and I now have P&L responsibility with a VP title. As all things, it’s probably a combination of factors including natural progression, new knowledge, extra credibility and confidence.

    For someone that was not a business major in college, it was essential for me. I knew nothing about accounting and finance, and knew very little about marketing and strategy. I knew I could lead, but I needed the external credibility to allow me to make a bid for those kinds of roles.

    I feel that an MBA’s value, right or wrong, is 25% knowledge-based, 35% access to staff and alumni networks and 40% “prestige” value - the prestige value has a doubling effect on the networking value. So, saying that Podunk U. offers the same material as a Duke or UNC or Wake isn’t really the same thing.

    Hope that helps.

  • Wuss Woman Says:

    Hey Blob Boy:

    I came to the exactly same conclusion..hey do you think it’s in the genes???? hahhaha

    Love
    Wuss Woman

Leave a Reply